Thanks in advance,
CaptainSilWhat's on your mind?
TEXT
POLL
- All434 posts
- General285 posts
- Roleplay/Fun & Games4 posts
- Site Problems9 posts
- Wikia Appearance14 posts
- New on Wander Over Yonder Wiki16 posts
- News and Announcements13 posts
- General Discussion93 posts
Sort by
Card Layout
Site Problems
Andy Bean confirmed http://noveltymusicservices.tumblr.com/post/140236087083/tonight-on-wander-over-yonder that "How are You?" and "Hater's Ballad" are part of "You're the Greatest", I've already combined all the info into the "You're the Greatest" article and fixed up any links I could find that needed fixing. How do I go about removing or appealing to remove the other two? Could somebody do that for me?
Just Updated
The articles on The Cool Guy and The Catastrophe badly needs new info on the episodes since they both premiered last night, im guessing this is because Wikia was performing maintenance and made the wiki read-only at an horrible time. (to be more specific, around when the episodes started).
Somebody added what I believe to be a user profile or an o.c profile to the character section, it shouldn't be there, how do I go about fixing that? Or could somebody else perhaps fix it?
I see users randomly adding production codes for the future episodes that have appeared on Zap2it. I want to be clear for everyone who reads this. Do not add assumptive production codes based on episodes' broadcast orders. They are not canon unless we receive them [the eleven minute ones] from Craig McCracken, [the half hour ones] from the Disney XD Press website, or the US Copyright Office database. Just because the first four [judging by half hour] (and the fifth unaired ep, I will add) episodes have had their broadcast order follow their production codes doesn't mean the rest of season 2 will. In fact, as with many television series, there will be at least one episode of this season that does not broadcast by its production code. So it is clear speculation to assume production codes based on scheduling order.
What's wrong with speculation? Well, if you speculate on articles, you're basically entering fan fiction territory, and if you speculate, you're also forming a personal opinion that cannot be backed up by undeniable evidence rather than speculation and thus your opinion will violate neutral point of view. We are a professional encyclopedia, not an alphabetically-organized dictionary of speculation, therefore we must go by undeniable evidence from reliable sources that something is true rather than theories formed by one random person that something "might" be true as it takes only one side and information on our encyclopedia must take both sides neutrally.